Skip to Content
DOC / SVC-01 - REV 01

IoT Hardware Design

Sensor electronics, power architecture, and prototype-ready connected devices, specified so that firmware, radio, and production all have something solid to build on.

SVC-01 / Overview

What IoT hardware design involves

Every connected product carries a set of decisions that are cheap to make on paper and expensive to revisit in silicon: which sensor actually resolves the phenomenon you care about, how much energy the device is allowed to spend per measurement, which radio the deployment environment will tolerate, and how the finished assembly gets tested on a production line. Hardware design is where those decisions get pinned down.

We work from the product requirement backwards. Before a schematic exists there is usually a sampling rate, an expected battery life, an enclosure constraint, and a target cost, and those four numbers determine most of the parts list between them. Discovering that they are in conflict is far cheaper on paper than after the first PCB spin.

Our involvement ranges from a focused review of an existing design to defining the electronics for a device from scratch. In either case the deliverable is a specification precise enough that firmware, radio work, and mechanical design can proceed in parallel rather than queueing behind each other.

SVC-01 / Capabilities

What this service covers

Capabilities
  • Sensor device architecture and measurement-chain definition.
  • Battery-powered electronics and energy budgeting.
  • Solar-assisted and energy-harvesting device concepts.
  • Radio platform selection across ESP32, STM32, and Nordic nRF.
  • Pressure, IMU, humidity, temperature, voltage, and environmental sensing.
  • PCB concept review and design-for-test feedback.
  • Connector, antenna, and enclosure constraints.
  • Production BOM preparation and sourcing-risk assessment.
SVC-01 / Method

How we approach hardware design

Start from the energy budget

For a battery device, the energy budget is the design. Once the measurement interval, the payload size, and the radio duty cycle are known, the achievable runtime is largely determined, and most remaining component choices are downstream of it. We build that budget before selecting parts and then hold the design to it.

This is also where unreachable requirements surface. A year of runtime on a coin cell while streaming continuously is not a design problem to be solved later, it is a specification to renegotiate in the first week.

Choose the radio before the microcontroller

Radio choice constrains everything downstream: antenna placement, enclosure material, the certification path, and how the mobile app is permitted to behave. BLE suits intermittent, phone-mediated products. Wi-Fi suits mains-powered devices that must reach a backend with no phone present. Many products need both, one for setup and one for ongoing data.

Selecting the microcontroller first and then discovering the radio does not fit the deployment is a common and entirely avoidable reversal.

Design for the production line, not the bench

A device that works on a desk but cannot be tested in thirty seconds at a factory is not finished. Test points, a manufacturing test mode in firmware, a way to program and serialise units, and a documented pass or fail criterion are part of the hardware specification, not an afterthought once units are being built.

Keep the bill of materials sourceable

Component availability is a design constraint like any other. We identify second sources for the parts that matter and flag single-source risk while alternatives can still be accommodated, rather than when a lead time has already stopped a build.

SVC-01 / Output

What you receive

Deliverables

  • An energy budget accounting for measurement, radio, and sleep current.
  • A specified measurement chain: sensor, conditioning, sampling, and expected resolution.
  • A recommended microcontroller and radio platform with the reasoning documented.
  • PCB concept review notes and design-for-test feedback.
  • A production BOM with sourcing risk identified.
  • A prototype plan with defined validation criteria.

When this fits

  • You have a product concept and need the electronics specified before firmware work starts.
  • You have a prototype that works but will not survive a production run.
  • You have a design from another supplier and want an independent review before committing to tooling.
FAQ

Questions we are asked about iot hardware design

Do you manufacture the hardware as well as design it?

We design and specify the electronics and prepare the production BOM. Manufacturing runs through partner factories or through a supplier you already work with. Keeping design separate from manufacturing means the design stays portable if you change factory.

Can you review an existing PCB rather than starting from scratch?

Yes, and it is a common starting point. A review is often the fastest way to locate the problem. We look at the measurement chain, the power architecture, radio and antenna placement, and testability, then report what will and will not survive production.

How early should hardware and firmware decisions be made together?

Immediately. Low-power behaviour, over-the-air update capability, and manufacturing test all require hardware support that is difficult or impossible to add later. We specify the hardware with the firmware architecture already in view.

What actually determines battery life in a sensor device?

In most designs the radio duty cycle and the sleep current dominate, not the sensor. Measurement interval, payload size, and how often the device must be reachable usually matter far more than the choice of microcontroller.

Sense more. Do more.

Have an IoT product idea or prototype that needs a professional architecture?

Tell us what you want to build. We help transform connected product ideas into systems that sense the real world and do useful work through hardware, firmware, apps, gateways, and backend systems.

Start a Project